Sign in or 

|
arete |
Latest page update: made by arete
, Jun 25 2009, 9:25 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
1 widget added 1 widget deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hsun3 | Emotion | 1 | Jun 15 2009, 10:50 PM EDT by Anonymous | ||
|
Thread started: Dec 21 2008, 11:49 PM EST
Watch
Emotion is difficult to describe, but it still is the common language of the human race. No matter how esoteric emotions may seem, people must try to really understand them if they ever wish to live happy and fulfilling lives. Probably one of the greatest oversights in understanding emotions is to believe that emotions are instinctual. Many people believe that they have no control over their emotions. The moment something happens is to rigger? One of these emotions, then it is inevitable that they must react immediately under the influence of their emotion. For example, if an unenlightened person in the realm of emotions was insulted, then their immediate emotional reaction would be to become angry and reciprocate the insult. What many people fail to realize is that emotions are entirely determined by their own choosing.
Nozick suggests that emotion has three elements: a belief, an evaluation and a feeling. In light of these concepts, it is easier to comprehend the truth. The feeling is the experienced affect of an emotion. The evaluation is a judgment that something (the object of the emotion) is a certain way, dangerous, in pain, a threat, worthy of being loved and cared for, beneath your notice. An emotion is “defective” or “inappropriate” if a) the belief is false, b) the evaluation is false, c)the feeling is “disproportionate to the evaluation” (p. 89), an emotion “fits when it has the above threefold structure of belief, evaluation, and feeling, and moreover when the belief is true, the evaluation is correct, and the feeling is proportionate to the evaluation.” (p. 89) |
|||||
| hsun3 | Happiness | 0 | Dec 21 2008, 11:48 PM EST by hsun3 | ||
|
Thread started: Dec 21 2008, 11:48 PM EST
Watch
Robert Nozick uses experience machine thought experiment. The purpose of the machine is to show something matters to us and “how things feel from the inside.” Nozick develops the connection between happiness and the experience machine in The Examined Life. He thinks that happiness is a kind of emotion which is characterized by both positive feelings and positive judgment about how our lives are going, is the highest activity of the soul in conformity with excellence and virtue. Given that happiness is a positive emotion, Nozick has no difficulty imagining why people find it desirable, but he argues that it is not the only emotion which has no connection with others, but it is a fitting response to people’s situation. That is, “What we want, in short, is a life and a self that happiness is a fitting response to – then to give it that response” (p. 117). So we should not just think about happiness itself, but we should care about doing things in our lives which can make us happy. He defines happiness in a way such that it is necessarily of limited value. He suggests happiness is connected to reality in a way that is more direct than what the experience machine offers is important.
How do we acquire happiness? People always are in order to obtain the final happiness to choose honor, pleasure, intelligence and all virtues. It is correct in theory. But many people cannot success in reality. Therefore, people should be self-sufficient. When people get more, the more they want. So people should find many things to make them happy. Sometimes people want to be happy, but they cannot get it without struggle. Happiness does not exist all the time, people should work for it. |
|||||
| brina* | L<3ve | 0 | Dec 18 2008, 12:53 AM EST by brina* | ||
|
Thread started: Dec 18 2008, 12:53 AM EST
Watch
I agree with Nozick's idea of the 'we' in a love relationship. He says that you are an 'I' until you enter into a 'we' relationship in which you and your partner's well-beings are tied together as one. This means that you feel their joy and their pain in a sense because of your tied well-being. I believe this to be true because it puts you on another level in a relationship and within love itself.
|
|||||